SharpReader vs. SauceReader Comparison

I installed SauceReader. Just wondered what the hell the blogosphere is talking about. GUI looks better than SharpReader's. Also it renders HTML better. I mean it renders HTML the way the author wrote it (with styles). But it takes SO much memory, come on, I'm subscribed to 3 feeds only. And there is no threading there. I'm staying with SharpReader, which is definitely the #1 aggregator for today.

Related Posts:

• SharpReader 0941
• Windows Installer XML (WiX) Toolset - for MSI (Open Source) Released

Thanks for the feedback on Sauce Reader. We'll take it into account for future versions. BTW, Sauce Reader definitely has a bigger initial memory footprint, but you may find as your feed list & number of items grows that it's memory use remains more constant.

Anyway, keep an eye on us, we're working hard and improving fast.

cheers, Nathan

Ok, I'll keep an eye on it, thanks for the feedback :)